PrescientIQ™ Enterprise Legal Services Platform
For partners, corporate counsel, and compliance officers: agents prepare due diligence reviews, e-discovery research, regulatory mapping, and filing drafts. Every output stops at an attorney approval gate before it goes anywhere, and every step is recorded to an immutable audit ledger.
Legal teams are moving past AI that simply generates text toward agents that carry work through a process: reviewing a data room against a playbook, working through a discovery set, or tracking regulatory change against a policy stack. That shift is where the real capacity is, and also where the real risk is.
A text generator produces a draft someone may or may not read. A workflow agent produces output that moves toward a client, a counterparty, or a court. That only works if two things exist first: a record of who reviewed and approved each piece of work, and a hard stop before anything leaves the team.
PrescientIQ is built around those two things. The agents do the preparation, and the attorney keeps the judgment, the signature, and the responsibility.
The split is the same in every workflow: the agent prepares, and the attorney decides. This table shows where that line sits in each.
| Workflow | The agent prepares | The attorney decides |
|---|---|---|
| M&A due diligence and contract review | Reviews agreements and flags red flags, liability caps, and deviations from your playbook. | Decides what is material, what to negotiate, and what the client hears. |
| Litigation and e-discovery | Searches case materials, internal memos, and discovery sets, and summarizes findings with the sources behind them. | Verifies every source and makes every responsiveness, privilege, and strategy call. |
| Regulatory and compliance mapping | Tracks regulatory changes in the jurisdictions you specify and maps them against your internal policies. | Determines whether a change applies, what the exposure is, and what remediation to pursue. |
| Regulatory filings | Prepares first drafts of routine regulatory filings. | Reviews, signs, and files. Nothing is filed without approval. |
Privilege, hallucination, and confidentiality are the reasons legal teams hold back on AI. Here is what the architecture does about each one, and where the answer has to come from your own counsel.
Hallucination
Agents surface the sources behind what they flag or summarize, so an attorney can check them against the underlying document. The approval gate means nothing reaches a client, a counterparty, or a court until someone has.
Privilege
No platform can promise privilege. That is a legal determination, and it belongs to your counsel. What we provide is the architecture and written data terms your counsel needs to make it.
Confidentiality
PrescientIQ is hosted and operated by MatrixLabX, stated plainly below with whose attestations apply. Your confidentiality analysis should start from how the system actually runs, not from a vendor’s summary of it.
The controls are built into the architecture. They are not a policy document asking the model to be careful.
Every proposed redline, filing draft, and external communication stops and waits for a named attorney. Nothing reaches a counterparty, a client, or a court on an agent’s output alone.
Every agent action is written with its rationale and the identity of the person who approved it, at the moment it occurs. Supervision becomes a record rather than a recollection.
Agents organize, review, flag, and draft. Legal reasoning, advice to the client, and responsibility for the work product stay with the attorney.
Where it runs, stated plainly
PrescientIQ is hosted and operated by MatrixLabX on Google Cloud, which maintains SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS-attested infrastructure. Per-agent least-privilege identities, prompt-injection defense on every inbound surface, and an immutable audit ledger record every action, its rationale, and the approving human.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS attestations are held by Google Cloud, which operates the underlying infrastructure. They are not MatrixLabX certifications.
MatrixLabX application-layer SOC 2 is in progress.
Legal buyers are the audience most likely to rely on what a vendor page says. These are claims you can expect from AI vendors, and why we do not make them.
Privilege and confidentiality analysis for any third-party platform belongs to your counsel and applicable ethics guidance. We provide the architecture and written data terms to support that analysis. We do not provide the conclusion.
It does not. PrescientIQ is hosted and operated by MatrixLabX. Any confidentiality analysis should start from that fact, and you should expect the same plain answer from every vendor you evaluate.
Agents organize, review, flag, and draft. Legal reasoning and judgment belong to the attorney, and every output that leaves the team passes through one.
Agents surface and draft; attorneys verify. A citation, quotation, or authority no attorney has checked against its source should not reach a client or a court. The approval gate exists to make that check unavoidable.
That is a contract term, not a web page sentence. Ask us for model-training exclusion, retention, and deletion in writing, and ask every vendor you evaluate for the same.
The discipline behind this comes from another regulated industry:
“I remember a specific meeting where a PM asked if we could ship the pulse oximeter first and patch the compliance documentation later. I had to stop the room and explain that under FDA regulations, if a process isn’t documented according to Good Manufacturing Practices, it didn’t happen. Treating regulatory standards as a toggle switch was simply not an option.”
— George Schildge, CEO & Chief AI Officer, MatrixLabX
With per-seat AI licensing, a legal team pays for access whether or not any work gets done. PrescientIQ’s Labor-as-a-Service model prices the work agents perform instead of the number of people holding a license.
Scope and commercial terms for a legal deployment are set during the readiness audit, before anything is signed.
An agent can only be held to a review standard that already exists. Answer two questions to see where to start.
This page describes how PrescientIQ is designed to operate. It is not legal advice, and it does not determine how any professional conduct rule, privilege doctrine, or confidentiality obligation applies to your use of an AI platform. Those determinations belong to your counsel. SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS attestations belong to Google Cloud, not MatrixLabX.
The free Agentic Readiness Audit returns a written assessment within 48 hours of the intake session.